How Systems Reveal Their True Direction
THE TWO DIMENSIONS EVERY SYSTEM CARRIES
Every system moves in two directions at once.
The first direction is Will—
what a system produces in the world
through its decisions, behaviors, incentives, and structures.
Will is revealed in impact.
The second direction is Faith—
the orientation behind the system’s choices,
the posture from which decisions are made,
the sincerity or strategy beneath its actions.
Faith is revealed in intention.
Together, Will and Faith form the unseen architecture of every organization, institution, and collective body.
They determine:
- how trust is earned or eroded,
- how alignment holds or drifts,
- how responsibility is carried or displaced,
- how purpose is preserved or compromised,
- and how systems move toward stewardship or extraction.
Most systems examine only one dimension.
They measure their Will through outcomes and perception.
Or they defend their Faith through values and plans.
But neither dimension reveals the truth on its own.
Will without Faith can be effective but corrosive.
Faith without Will can be pure but ineffective.
Only when both dimensions are seen together
does the real direction of a system become visible.
This writing begins with a simple belief:
To lead responsibly is to see both what a system intends
and what it actually produces.
To see both the clarity and the contradiction.
To see both the trust it receives
and the cost it transfers outward.
This is the ledger many leaders have felt but never named.
What follows is the architecture of that ledger.
Not as a critique.
But as a way to see systems whole—
and to steward their direction with coherence, integrity, and accountability.
SECTION I — WILL
What a System Produces in the World
Will is the direction of a system’s behavior—
the pattern created by its decisions over time.
Unlike mission or intention,
Will is not declared.
It is demonstrated.
Will is visible in:
- the outcomes a system consistently creates,
- the burdens it distributes,
- the clarity or confusion it generates,
- the stability or volatility it imposes,
- the alignment or contradiction revealed in its actions.
Will is not reactive.
It is cumulative.
It shows up in the trajectory of a system—
the line that forms when many small decisions point in the same direction.
Where a system’s Will moves,
its legacy follows.
THE TWO DIRECTIONS OF WILL
Will has two fundamental expressions:
1. Good Will — the trust a system generates
Good Will appears when the system’s behavior:
- strengthens alignment,
- reinforces its purpose,
- resolves complexity rather than exporting it,
- distributes responsibility proportionally,
- and creates conditions others can rely on.
Good Will is not sentiment.
It is structural stability:
a system behaving consistently with its stated purpose.
It is the trust a system earns.
2. Bad Will — the harm a system generates
Bad Will appears when the system’s behavior:
- shifts burdens onto those without power,
- creates contradiction faster than it resolves it,
- privileges performance over coherence,
- obscures responsibility,
- or protects itself at the expense of others.
Bad Will is not interpersonal tension.
It is systemic distortion:
the cost imposed outward because of structural misalignment.
It is the erosion a system causes.
WILL IS THE SYSTEM’S TRUTH
Because Will is revealed through action,
it exposes the actual ethics of the system more clearly than any statement, value, or strategy.
A system’s Will answers questions its leaders often cannot:
- What is prioritized when pressure rises?
- Where does burden settle?
- What contradictions are tolerated?
- What behaviors are implicitly rewarded?
- What patterns remain unchanged?
- Who absorbs the cost of decisions?
A system can say one thing and Will another.
When this happens, the Will is the truth.
Will is not what a system claims.
Will is what a system creates.
And every system, without exception, produces both Good Will and Bad Will.
The ledger begins here.
SECTION II — FAITH
What a System Intends Through Its Posture and Orientation
If Will is what a system produces,
Faith is what a system is oriented toward.
Faith is not belief.
It is not mission statements or values on a wall.
It is not the sincerity of individual leaders.
Faith is the operative posture of a system—
the internal compass by which decisions are made
when no one is looking
and no rules are written.
Faith determines why a system acts
before Will reveals what it has done.
THE TWO DIRECTIONS OF FAITH
Faith, like Will, has two fundamental expressions:
1. Good Faith — intention aligned with purpose
A system moves in Good Faith when:
- decisions reflect stated purpose,
- responsibility matches authority,
- transparency governs process,
- leaders act without hidden motives,
- and the system’s commitments constrain its power.
Good Faith is not purity.
It is alignment.
It is the orientation of a system that intends to live by its principles,
even when doing so limits convenience, speed, or control.
Good Faith reveals a willingness to act coherently.
2. Bad Faith — intention aligned with self-preservation
A system moves in Bad Faith when:
- decisions protect image over integrity,
- values are invoked but not obeyed,
- responsibility is displaced downward,
- contradictions are allowed to accumulate,
- or leaders conceal misalignment behind narrative or performance.
Bad Faith is not malice.
It is misalignment.
It is the posture of a system that intends to survive itself,
even if doing so distorts its purpose
or burdens those who depend on it.
Bad Faith reveals a willingness to act strategically rather than truthfully.
FAITH IS THE SYSTEM’S ORIENTATION
While Will reveals what a system has done,
Faith reveals why the system does it.
Faith answers questions that Will alone cannot:
- What governs the system’s decisions?
- Does purpose constrain or merely decorate behavior?
- Are values directional or optional?
- Is leadership acting in stewardship or strategy?
- Do intentions match structures?
- Does the system protect people or itself?
Faith exposes the inner architecture of leadership
long before Will reveals the outer consequences.
If Will is the truth of impact,
Faith is the truth of intention.
When these truths diverge,
the system begins to drift.
SECTION III — PLOTTING THE CROSS
Where Intention and Impact Reveal the System’s True State
When Faith (orientation) and Will (impact) are seen together,
the system’s true direction becomes visible.
To understand a system fully:
- we cannot look only at what it intends (Faith),
- nor only at what it produces (Will).
Intention without impact is incomplete.
Impact without intention is misleading.
Only the intersection reveals the truth.
This intersection forms a simple cross:
- Vertical axis: Will
- Good Will (trust generated)
- Bad Will (harm generated)
- Horizontal axis: Faith
- Good Faith (purpose-aligned)
- Bad Faith (self-preserving)
Plotted together, they create four systemic states—
not moral categories,
but structural realities.
Each quadrant reveals a different combination
of what the system means
and what the system creates.
This is the whole ledger.
THE FOUR STATES OF THE SYSTEM
I. GOOD FAITH + GOOD WILL
Stewardship — alignment expressed as impact
The system intends coherence
and produces trust.
This is:
- purpose governing behavior,
- alignment maintained over time,
- responsibility carried proportionally,
- contradictions confronted early,
- complexity absorbed at the level of authority,
- trust strengthened by consistency.
This quadrant is not perfection.
It is integrity in motion.
The system’s direction matches its claims.
II. GOOD FAITH + BAD WILL
Unexamined Drift — sincerity without structural alignment
The system intends coherence
but produces harm or contradiction.
This is:
- values held sincerely but supported weakly,
- responsibility misplaced unintentionally,
- structural gaps unrecognized,
- burdens shifted without awareness,
- contradictions allowed to grow beneath aspiration.
Leaders in this quadrant are often earnest
but under-calibrated.
Good Faith does not guarantee Good Will.
Good intentions cannot compensate for misaligned systems.
The system drifts not from malice,
but from unexamined architecture.
III. BAD FAITH + GOOD WILL
Performance — trust maintained through appearance
The system does not intend coherence
but still produces trust.
This is the most deceptive quadrant.
It appears stable because:
- reputation is strong,
- outcomes seem positive,
- goodwill from the past still circulates.
But underneath:
- values are optional,
- responsibility is displaced,
- contradictions accumulate quietly,
- narrative replaces alignment,
- the system uses its inherited trust as a shield.
Good Will masks Bad Faith.
This quadrant often precedes collapse.
IV. BAD FAITH + BAD WILL
Extraction — misalignment expressed as harm
The system neither intends coherence
nor produces trust.
Here we find:
- self-preservation as strategy,
- harm normalized,
- accountability absent or theatrical,
- complexity pushed downward,
- purpose referenced but rarely restraining behavior,
- trust declining faster than it can be repaired.
This quadrant is not merely failing.
It is eroding.
Without correction,
extraction becomes identity.
THE CROSS IS A MIRROR, NOT A JUDGMENT
No system stays in one quadrant forever.
Systems move.
They drift.
They realign.
They collapse.
They recover.
The purpose of the cross is not to label a system
but to orient leadership:
- Where are we now?
- What direction are we moving?
- What is being produced?
- What is being preserved?
- What is being betrayed?
- What must be corrected?
The cross reveals what leaders cannot see by instinct alone:
the coherence or contradiction between what the system means
and what the system makes.
This is the beginning of accountability.
SECTION IV — WHAT PLOTTING REVEALS
The Structural Truths That Emerge When Intention and Impact Are Seen Together
Plotting Faith and Will on the same cross does not create a model.
It reveals the actual architecture of a system—
the truths that were present all along
but scattered across experience, instinct, and contradiction.
Seeing the cross for the first time is not an introduction.
It is a recognition.
It makes visible what leaders often intuit but rarely articulate:
a system always moves in the direction of its practiced patterns,
not its stated purpose.
Plotting reveals five structural truths.
1. Intention and Impact Are Not the Same
Faith (intention) can be coherent
while Will (impact) is not.
Many systems believe their Good Faith guarantees Good Will.
But sincerity cannot compensate for structural misalignment.
Conversely, Will can appear strong—
good outcomes, good reputation—
while Faith is misaligned.
Plotting reveals the uncomfortable but liberating truth:
What a system means and what a system does
must be seen as separate realities.
Only then can they be realigned.
2. Good Will Can Hide Bad Faith
A system can stand in a quadrant of inherited trust
while its posture has drifted toward self-preservation.
This is the most dangerous state.
Bad Faith disguised by Good Will
creates:
- delayed consequences,
- unspoken contradictions,
- cultural erosion,
- a widening gap between narrative and reality.
Leaders in this quadrant fail not because of crisis,
but because crisis was concealed by goodwill for too long.
Plotting removes the disguise.
3. Good Faith Can Still Create Bad Will
A system can be principled
and still produce harm.
This is the quadrant of unexamined drift.
Plotting makes it clear:
- values alone cannot hold alignment,
- intentions do not carry structural weight,
- aspiration does not resolve contradiction,
- sincerity does not guarantee coherence.
This frees leaders from self-blame
and directs their attention to architecture, not virtue.
Good Faith must be supported by good structure.
4. Bad Will Is Not Always Malevolent — Often It Is Structural
Bad Will is not proof of corruption.
It is proof of misalignment.
Plotting clarifies that:
- burden displacement,
- contradictory signals,
- misaligned incentives,
- and systemic drift
do not always originate from malice.
Often they arise from leaders who have not yet seen the full ledger.
Plotting converts ambiguity into accuracy.
5. Movement Matters More Than Position
A system is not defined by the quadrant it occupies,
but by the direction it is moving.
Plotting reveals trajectory:
- toward alignment or away from it,
- toward coherence or contradiction,
- toward stewardship or extraction,
- toward Good Faith expressed as Good Will
or Bad Faith expressed as Bad Will.
A single quadrant is a moment.
A system’s direction is its future.
The cross is not a static map.
It is a compass.
WHAT PLOTTING GIVES LEADERS
The ability to see:
- not just whether people trust the system,
but whether that trust is deserved; - not just whether the system intends good,
but whether that good is experienced; - not just whether the system seems stable,
but what stability is built upon; - not just individual decisions,
but the cumulative pattern they create.
Plotting reveals the truth leaders must confront
before systems can realign.
It takes the invisible half of impact
and places it beside the visible half of trust.
Only when both are seen
can leadership be exercised with coherence.
SECTION V — WHAT IT MEANS FOR BUSINESS
Organizations Built on Goodwill Must Reckon With Bad Will
Modern businesses rely heavily on goodwill.
Brand equity, reputation, customer trust, investor confidence—
these are treated as strategic assets.
But plotted on the cross, a deeper truth appears:
Most organizations measure only the trust they receive,
not the cost they generate.
This is the half-ledger problem at industrial scale.
The cross exposes three truths about business systems:
1. Goodwill Without Good Faith Becomes Reputation Without Integrity
Many companies enjoy strong goodwill because of:
- past performance,
- polished narrative,
- market dominance,
- recognized branding,
- customer habituation.
But goodwill alone does not reveal the system’s true direction.
Bad Faith can hide behind:
- aspirational values that do not govern decisions,
- public commitments that are not operationalized,
- messaging that exceeds reality,
- internal contradictions masked by external trust.
The cross clarifies:
Goodwill can stabilize a system even as its orientation drifts.
Stability does not guarantee alignment.
2. Good Faith Does Not Prevent Organizational Harm
Many businesses operate with sincere values and genuine intentions.
They speak consistently about purpose, culture, and people.
Their leaders strive for coherence.
And yet, plotted on the cross, they may still generate Bad Will:
- unintentional burden displacement,
- structural inequities,
- unclear accountability,
- scaled complexity that overwhelms individuals,
- policies that contradict stated values.
These systems do not fail from lack of morality.
They fail from lack of systemic alignment.
The cross teaches:
A principled orientation cannot compensate for architectural drift.
Good Faith must be matched by structural integrity.
3. Bad Will Accumulates When Systems Optimize for Themselves
Many organizations default to self-preservation under:
- pressure,
- competition,
- rapid growth,
- market volatility,
- investor scrutiny.
When this happens, they occupy the quadrants of Bad Faith—
often without naming it:
- decisions driven by optics rather than truth,
- accountability displaced,
- risk transferred downward,
- harm justified as necessity,
- contradictions tolerated to protect performance.
This produces Bad Will faster than goodwill can repair it.
The cross reveals:
Extraction is not an event.
It is a direction.
A pattern of decisions that shifts cost outward
while shielding the institution.
THE CROSS IS A TOOL OF CORPORATE ORIENTATION
When applied to business, the cross reveals:
- where trust is genuine and where it is borrowed,
- where values govern decisions and where they are ornamental,
- where responsibility is aligned and where it is displaced,
- where structure supports purpose and where it undermines it,
- where the system is coherent and where it is fracturing.
This is not a critique of companies.
It is a method for leaders to see their system whole.
Businesses succeed when both axes point toward alignment:
Good Faith → Good Will.
When one axis drifts,
the system must be recalibrated before drift becomes identity.
SECTION VI — WHAT IT MEANS FOR LEADERS
Leadership Is the Stewardship of Direction Across the Cross
A leader’s task is not to eliminate drift
or guarantee perfect alignment.
No system is static.
No structure is without friction.
A leader’s responsibility is simpler
and more demanding:
to see the system whole
and to steer its movement with intention.
The cross makes this possible by revealing directions that instinct alone cannot.
When leaders understand Faith and Will together,
three clarities emerge.
1. Leaders Are Accountable for Both Intention and Impact
Most leaders defend one axis:
- “Our intentions were good.”
- “Our results speak for themselves.”
But the cross rejects this separation.
Leadership is neither:
- intention without impact,
nor - impact without intention.
Leadership is the coherence between the two.
A leader must examine:
- What do we intend? (Faith)
- What do we produce? (Will)
- Do these directions align?
- Where are they diverging?
- What patterns are forming?
Accountability is the willingness to reconcile orientation with outcome.
2. Drift Happens When Leaders Conflate Goodwill With Alignment
Goodwill—trust from employees, customers, or communities—can seduce leaders into believing the system is aligned.
But goodwill only measures one axis:
the trust received, not the integrity practiced.
Leaders must therefore ask:
- Are we standing in Good Will because of past leadership—or current alignment?
- Is goodwill masking contradictions we have not addressed?
- Has inherited trust become a substitute for ongoing coherence?
Goodwill is not evidence of direction.
Will is.
The system moves where decisions take it,
not where reputation suggests it is going.
3. Leaders Reveal Themselves by How They Respond to Quadrants
Each quadrant demands a different kind of leadership:
Good Faith + Good Will → Stewardship
Maintain coherence.
Guard alignment.
Resolve contradictions early.
Preserve purpose against drift.
Good Faith + Bad Will → Calibration
Diagnose structural misalignment.
Realign incentives and responsibility.
Strengthen architecture, not aspiration.
Bad Faith + Good Will → Repentance
Name the misalignment.
Re-center purpose.
Disallow narrative from disguising reality.
Rebuild integrity before trust collapses.
Bad Faith + Bad Will → Reconstruction
Re-examine purpose.
Restore accountability.
Lift responsibility back to authority.
Rebuild structure from first principles.
Leaders cannot choose their quadrant,
but they can choose their movement.
The cross becomes a map of direction—
what must be preserved, corrected, exposed, or rebuilt.
THE LEADER’S WORK IS DIRECTIONAL, NOT PERFORMATIVE
A leader is not measured by:
- charisma,
- eloquence,
- productivity,
- public confidence,
- or inherited goodwill.
A leader is measured by the direction of the system under their care.
- Is it moving toward coherence or contradiction?
- Toward stewardship or extraction?
- Toward Good Faith expressed as Good Will—
or toward Bad Faith expressed as Bad Will?
The cross does not praise or condemn.
It orients.
It returns leadership to its true responsibility:
to steward the system’s will
so that impact aligns with intention.
This is the core of ethical leadership.
SECTION VII — WHAT IT MEANS FOR HUMANITY
How the Movements of Our Systems Shape the World We Inherit
Systems do not exist in isolation.
Their movements accumulate.
Their drift spreads.
Their alignment stabilizes.
Their contradictions ripple outward.
Their faith and will become the conditions of our common life.
When we plot systems across the cross,
we are not diagnosing businesses or institutions alone.
We are seeing the architecture of the world we are creating.
1. Collective Good Will Creates Social Trust
When systems consistently move through Good Faith + Good Will,
they generate more than organizational stability.
They generate:
- trust between institutions and people,
- coherence between purpose and practice,
- predictability in public life,
- legitimacy in leadership,
- confidence in shared direction.
Social trust is not abstract.
It is the cumulative effect of aligned systems.
When alignment is the norm,
communities experience continuity rather than volatility.
This is the bedrock of any functioning society.
2. Collective Bad Will Erodes the Fabric of Belonging
When systems move through Bad Faith + Bad Will,
they do more than mismanage themselves.
They:
- fracture social cohesion,
- amplify cynicism and disbelief,
- normalize displacement of burden,
- turn contradiction into expectation,
- and embed misalignment into culture itself.
People learn to expect:
- instability,
- opacity,
- institutional self-protection,
- responsibilities without power,
- and outcomes without accountability.
This erosion accumulates faster than goodwill can offset.
Bad Will at scale becomes cultural drift.
3. Good Faith Alone Cannot Sustain a Society
Communities often rely on the Good Faith of individuals, leaders, or small groups.
But without Good Will—coherent structures that produce alignment—
good intention cannot shield society from systemic contradictions.
Good Faith needs architecture.
Otherwise we end up with:
- sincere people inside ineffective systems,
- communities held together by effort rather than structure,
- moral aspiration without institutional reinforcement,
- and cultural exhaustion despite noble intention.
Humanity cannot rely on sincerity alone.
It requires coherence.
4. Good Will Without Good Faith Creates Fragile Stability
Societies experiencing inherited trust—
trust built from previous eras, previous leaders, previous sacrifices—
may appear stable even while Bad Faith grows underneath.
This leads to sudden collapse:
- legitimacy dissolves,
- contradictions surface,
- trust evaporates,
- systems fail in clusters.
The collapse is rarely new.
It is the revealing of years of unaddressed drift.
Good Will without Good Faith is a temporary inheritance.
It cannot sustain generations.
5. Humanity Flourishes When Systems Move Toward Alignment
The cross reveals a simple but profound truth:
Human flourishing emerges when systems produce Good Will
aligned with Good Faith.
This is the condition in which:
- responsibility matches authority,
- leadership matches purpose,
- burden is carried proportionally,
- decisions reinforce coherence,
- systems tell the truth in their actions,
- and public trust rises organically.
This is not idealism.
It is ethical architecture.
Societies become peaceful, stable, and generative
when their systems move in alignment
more often than in drift.
6. Humanity Suffers When Systems Normalize Bad Faith and Bad Will
When extraction becomes identity,
when contradiction becomes culture,
when drift becomes norm,
when accountability disappears,
when trust is consumed faster than it is earned—
humanity bears the cost.
Not morally—
structurally.
People must compensate for what systems refuse to carry:
- emotional weight,
- economic burden,
- cognitive overload,
- systemic instability,
- moral contradiction.
Where systems fail to align,
humans absorb the misalignment.
This is why the cross matters.
It is not about making better organizations.
It is about preventing avoidable suffering.
THE HUMANITY IMPLICATION: THE CROSS IS A MAP OF OUR FUTURE
The movements of our systems determine:
- whether trust strengthens or collapses,
- whether society stabilizes or fractures,
- whether generations inherit coherence or contradiction,
- whether purpose governs institutions or institutions devour purpose.
The cross reveals the truth simply:
A society cannot flourish
if its systems drift away from their purpose
faster than leaders realign them.
The future is shaped not by aspiration
but by direction.
SECTION VIII — CLOSING MOVEMENT
What It Means to See Intention and Impact Together
When we look at a system through both its intention and its impact,
its direction becomes unmistakable.
Faith shows what the system is oriented toward.
Will shows what the system leaves in its wake.
Together they reveal the movement that shapes legacy.
This way of seeing does not simplify complexity.
It clarifies it.
It allows leaders to notice the difference between:
- alignment and performance,
- coherence and optimism,
- responsibility and displacement,
- purpose and narrative,
- trust inherited and trust deserved.
It frees leaders from defending intention
and from being defined by outcomes alone.
It places attention on the trajectory—
the line created by repeated decisions over time.
Direction is where truth lives.
LEADERSHIP AS DIRECTIONAL RESPONSIBILITY
A leader’s work is not to avoid every contradiction
or prevent every instance of harm.
A leader’s work is to:
- see where the system stands,
- understand how it arrived there,
- name the forces shaping its movement,
- and guide it toward coherence.
When intention drifts from impact,
course correction is the work.
When impact outpaces intention,
structure is the work.
When narrative hides contradiction,
truth is the work.
When responsibility slips downward,
realignment is the work.
Leadership becomes the quiet discipline
of matching orientation with outcome.
SYSTEMS AS THE ARCHITECTS OF THE WORLD
Every system, by how it moves,
contributes to the world we collectively inhabit.
Some movements create trust,
others create erosion.
Some create stability,
others create fracture.
What we inherit tomorrow
is the sum of how our systems move today.
When intention and impact align,
systems strengthen the world around them.
When they drift apart,
the world carries the cost.
This is not a warning.
It is clarity.
When leaders see both axes,
they gain the ability to move systems with integrity.
THE QUIET TRUTH
A system tells the truth of itself
not by what it claims
but by the direction its choices form.
When intention and impact are brought into view,
the truth is no longer hidden.
It stands plainly:
We shape the world through the alignment of what we mean
and what we make.
That alignment is the work.
That work is leadership.
And leadership is the responsibility
we pass forward to those who will inherit what we build.
Explore the SHL Model →
Jump to The Audit of Will →