↓

The Leadership Paradox

In leadership, the more you cling, the more you lose. Explore a paradox where leading well means letting go wisely, with trust and steady cultivation.

By Sam Sukumar

Table of Contents

Introduction

Leadership today is adrift.

Once synonymous with stewardship—guiding people through vision, trust, and environments nurturing innovation—leadership has devolved into engineering outcomes. In today’s fast-changing world, leaders are evaluated by short-term metrics—numbers and KPIs have become gospel, benchmarks against which leadership itself is judged.

Yet, a fundamental flaw emerges: leadership is being treated like an algorithm, reducing human complexity to data points. But leadership is not about control—it is about wisdom, trust, and connection. From startups to corporations and governments, organizations are caught in endless cycles of optimization. Efficiency reigns supreme. Quarterly reports dictate direction. Essential human elements—trust, connection, shared vision—are lost, collateral damage in the relentless pursuit of immediate results.

I’ve experienced this shift firsthand. I’ve grappled with its consequences personally, both as an individual forced to lead myself out of necessity and later as someone mentored by exceptional leaders whose practices defied conventional wisdom. My perspective isn’t drawn merely from boardrooms but from personal struggle, profound self-awareness, and observation of leadership that contrasts sharply with prevailing norms.

My key realization is simple yet profound: true leadership doesn’t come from forced outcomes but from recognizing the path already unfolding, guiding it with wisdom, humility, and genuine presence.

Critics often question this approach: does guiding by letting go mean relinquishing all control? Absolutely not. It means replacing illusory control—micromanagement and fear—with true influence, cultivated through clear purpose, presence, attentive listening, and trust. It’s about understanding that real control is never imposed but is earned by clarity, authenticity, and relationships.

Another skepticism is whether authentic leadership compromises performance or ambition. In reality, the opposite holds true: authentic leadership fuels deeper motivation and genuine commitment. By aligning personal ambition with collective purpose, it nurtures sustainable performance, surpassing what fear-based targets can achieve.

To help leaders reclaim authenticity, I’ve distilled a transformative framework from my experience, which I call the 3C Model:

  • Core: Start within. Authentic leadership begins with self-awareness, core values, and integrity.
  • Connect: Engage attentively. Real influence emerges through active listening, genuine presence, and empowerment.
  • Cultivate: Lead sustainably. Transcend short-term results to foster trust, resilience, and stewardship.

The 3C Model isn’t a rigid formula; it’s a leadership mindset shift that replaces control with influence and short-term pressure with long-term impact.

Throughout this book, I’ll explore each component deeply, sharing diverse insights and examples from my journey and remarkable leaders across fields—corporate, non-profit, education, and community organizing. The goal isn’t to dictate solutions but provoke reflection: What does leadership mean to you? How do you practice it? What lasting impact do you seek?

In my experience, leadership’s true paradox lies here: the most powerful influence comes not from tight grasping but letting go—not imposing will, but attuning ourselves to wisdom and deeper currents of truth already present around us.

Welcome to this exploration. Welcome to The Leadership Paradox.

Part One: The Leadership Problem

Leadership Has Become Outcome Engineering—And That’s a Problem

Leadership once stood for something deeply human—an art of stewardship, guiding others with vision, building trust, and nurturing environments where growth and innovation flourished naturally. Leaders didn’t manage results; they created conditions where results emerged sustainably and ethically.

Yet, leadership today has drastically shifted. Vision is replaced by immediacy, trust by control, and connection by metrics. In many organizations, leadership has become a pursuit of short-term wins and measurable efficiencies—as though people’s dynamics could be computed like an equation. While metrics have value, over-reliance on them distorts leadership’s true purpose.

Examples of Outcome Obsession

Wells Fargo: Leadership By Fear
Once a trusted banking institution, Wells Fargo imposed aggressive sales targets on employees. Terrified of repercussions, employees opened millions of fake accounts. Trust, reputation, and financial stability suffered deeply. Wells Fargo’s leadership, fixated on engineered outcomes, forgot stewardship. Their pursuit of metrics, ironically, caused their downfall.

Tech Layoffs: People Reduced to Numbers
Tech firms often aggressively hire during prosperity, then cut thousands during downturns in the name of “shareholder value.” People are treated as expendable resources—maximized in boom, discarded in bust. This reactionary cost management, not leadership, sacrifices long-term resilience for momentary efficiency, eroding trust and stability.

Elon Musk’s Twitter: Rapid Results, Lasting Damage
Elon Musk’s takeover of Twitter demonstrates outcome engineering’s flaws: mass layoffs, extreme work demands, and rapid culture overhaul were aimed at immediate results. But morale plummeted, internal trust eroded, and instability distracted from genuine innovation. Quick gains undermined long-term creativity, trust, and collaboration.

The Non-Profit Sector: Metrics Over Mission
Non-profits aren’t exempt. Donor pressures for quantifiable outcomes can distort missions, prompting organizations to chase shallow metrics. Community services become driven by “reportable numbers,” weakening genuine, transformative impact.

Education: Standardized Tests Over Learning
Outcome obsession thrives in education, where standardized testing often measures short-term retention rather than deep, lasting understanding. Teachers are forced to “teach to the test,” limiting creativity and authentic engagement with students, compromising true educational purpose.

The Real Costs of Outcome Engineering

These examples illustrate a widespread mindset prioritizing numbers above people and short-term gains above lasting impact. But if the problem is clear, so is the solution: reclaiming leadership’s human essence. How? Through the 3C Model.

  • Erosion of Trust: Trust disintegrates when leadership values outcomes at any cost. Employees feel undervalued, seen merely as cogs in a machine.
  • Loss of Sustainability: Quick wins often jeopardize long-term stability. Obsession with immediate results leaves organizations vulnerable to volatility and change.
  • Absence of Human Connection: Decisions grow transactional, relationships commodified. Leaders become disconnected from the realities and humanity of those they lead, lacking empathy and genuine motivation.

Critics might argue, “Metrics and short-term goals are essential in a competitive, fast-paced environment.”

I acknowledge that metrics are indeed useful. However, overdependence on them distorts priorities, often incentivizing unethical behavior. Real success requires balanced measurement—quantifiable results and intangible but essential components like trust, culture, and long-term vision. Sustainable leadership integrates metrics with meaning.

Leaders Who Got It Right

Inspiring examples exist of leaders who rejected shortsighted tactics, choosing authentic leadership aligned with the 3C Model: Core, Connect, Cultivate. They demonstrate the practicality and effectiveness of leadership rooted in values, genuine connection, and lasting stewardship.

Alan Mulally at Ford: Values in Crisis
In 2006, Ford faced crisis. Instead of typical layoffs and quick fixes, Mulally chose authenticity. He emphasized transparency and vulnerability, encouraging executives to confront problems openly. Rather than dictate, he listened deeply, empowering collaborative solutions. His vision emphasized product innovation and sustainability—choices initially unpopular but profoundly effective. Ford avoided bankruptcy in 2008, emerging stronger.

Satya Nadella at Microsoft: Culture Revival
In 2014, Microsoft was stagnant. Observers expected layoffs and rigid targets. Instead, Nadella transformed its famously combative culture. He stressed humility, empathy, and continuous learning, modeling it personally. Nadella connected deeply with employees, nurturing curiosity over ego. His cultural shift spurred innovation and collaboration, leading Microsoft’s impressive resurgence.

Jacinda Ardern: Empathy in Politics
New Zealand Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern exemplifies leadership driven by empathy and authenticity. Her responses to national tragedies—terrorist attacks, natural disasters—demonstrated deep compassion and decisive action. Ardern’s style emphasized unity and long-term community healing over short-term political gains, strengthening public trust profoundly.

Dr. Paul Farmer: Authenticity in Global Health
In global health, Dr. Paul Farmer founded Partners In Health on radical humanism. Rejecting metrics-driven, superficial interventions, Farmer prioritized relationships, trust, and dignity. His holistic approach didn’t sacrifice rigor—it made health outcomes enduring, communities resilient, and impact transformative.

Why Outcome Engineering Persists

Despite its costs, outcome obsession persists because systemic structures reward short-termism. Shareholders and boards pressure leaders into immediate returns; media judges leaders by quarterly earnings; executive compensation links directly to short-term market performance; even business education values quantifiable achievements over intangible qualities like empathy and stewardship.

To overcome outcome engineering, we must challenge these deeper systemic forces, not just individual behavior.

Reframing the Questions

Given these consequences, critical questions arise:

  • Are we leading people—or merely managing results?
  • Are we engineering short-term wins—or cultivating long-term growth?
  • Are we optimizing performance—or building genuine, enduring trust?

Ultimately, we must reconsider leadership not as outcome engineering but a fundamentally human endeavor rooted in self-awareness, genuine connection, and lasting stewardship. It demands we revisit leadership’s very essence, challenging prevailing norms and assumptions.

It demands beginning within, connecting authentically, and cultivating enduring leadership.

Part Two: Core — Beginning Within

Leadership Begins Within

Leadership doesn’t start with titles or external vision; it begins within. Long before leading others, I learned to lead myself out of sheer necessity. Early life was turbulent; clear paths were absent. Leadership meant creating direction amid disorder—defining myself when guidance lacked.

In those years, leadership wasn’t about authority; it was about survival, self-direction born from necessity. Quiet examples around me—everyday people displaying integrity, presence, and consistency—taught lessons no textbook could.

Knowing Yourself: The Starting Point

Before leading others, you must know yourself deeply—your values, strengths, limitations, and inner compass. True leadership demands understanding what you stand for and refuse to compromise.

My grandfather exemplified this quietly. A man of few words, his dignity and integrity spoke through actions. Observing him taught me leadership’s true power: authenticity, consistency, quiet conviction. This self-awareness anchors leadership, guiding when external signals falter. Without knowing your core, leadership lacks authenticity. Rooted in self-awareness, it becomes resonant and real.

Authentic Leadership Isn’t Control, But Presence

I once believed leadership meant having answers and exerting control. Life taught me differently. True leadership isn’t about loud voices or commands; it’s about genuine presence—listening, engaging fully, adapting with humility.

A mentor rarely gave direct advice. Instead, he asked transformative questions: “What do you see others don’t? Do you have courage to act?” These questions taught me leadership isn’t about omniscience but trusting my ability to navigate complexity. True leadership requires relinquishing illusory control, choosing attentive presence and authenticity instead.

Balancing Presence with Decisiveness

Critics ask: “Isn’t strong leadership decisive? Won’t constant listening cause indecision?” Decisiveness matters—but rushed decisions from ego rarely endure. Authentic presence doesn’t mean passivity; it means acting from clarity. Leaders attuned deeply to themselves and others decide swiftly, wisely, guided by integrity, not reaction.

Influence: Subtle, Enduring, Invisible

True influence rarely yields immediate proof. Instead, it shapes lives quietly—like water shaping stone through persistent subtlety. Years later, a colleague confided, “I learned strength watching you handle pressure.” That conversation humbled me. True leadership often goes unnoticed, its impact felt long after.

How you respond to setbacks, carry yourself, and treat others creates ripples. You may never fully see their reach. But by living aligned with your values, your presence makes an impact—seen or unseen.

Humility as Leadership’s Anchor

Humility isn’t shrinking yourself; it’s recognizing your part in something larger. Zulu philosophy captures this: “Umuntu ngumuntu ngabantu”—“A person is a person through other people.” Authentic leaders embody humility, understanding leadership as service, not status or ego.

Examples of Authentic Self-Leadership

Nelson Mandela: His self-awareness, cultivated during imprisonment, guided South Africa’s peaceful transition. Mandela’s introspection and humility inspired trust, turning adversaries into partners.

Malala Yousafzai: Her leadership began in self-reflection and authenticity—choosing to speak her truth despite risks. She shows leadership rooted not in authority but in deep internal conviction.

Yvon Chouinard, Patagonia Founder: His profound environmental values and humility built Patagonia into a global example of ethical business. Chouinard’s self-awareness shaped leadership that transcended profit.

Leadership as Responsibility and Service

I never sought leadership; it came as responsibility. Family, community, work—all required decisions and accountability. Leadership isn’t privilege; it’s duty, service, practice. I lead not from power desire but refusal to abandon responsibility.

Leadership’s true paradox: it’s about presence, connection, responsibility—yet also detachment from ego, status, validation. It isn’t stepping ahead but stepping back, creating space for others’ paths. Ultimately, leadership isn’t leading others; it’s leading yourself so authentically that others find their paths alongside you.

Is Self-Leadership Self-Centered?

Skeptics might say self-leadership risks self-absorption. But genuine self-leadership isn’t self-obsession; it’s profound responsibility to others. By understanding yourself deeply, you become more empathetic, capable of true service. Authentic self-leaders inspire through humility and genuine connection, not ego.

Reflection Exercise: Begin Within

  • What core values guide you?
  • How aligned are your actions with these values?
  • Where do you seek illusory control? How could you replace it with presence?
  • Who exemplifies self-leadership to you? What traits inspire you most?

Part Three: Connect — Engaging Attentively

Leading by Following: The Art of Attentive Engagement

Traditional leadership emphasizes setting visions, asserting authority, stepping forward. But true leadership might mean stepping back—not from passivity, but wisdom. Not relinquishing responsibility, but directing it where it naturally flows.

Great leaders I’ve known don’t force; they deeply connect, listen intently, and reveal the genuine needs of the moment. This adaptive influence—”Leading by Following”—transforms our understanding of leadership.

The Leader as Listener

Effective leadership begins not with speech but attentive listening. Influential leaders hear what’s unspoken—the subtle concerns, quiet hopes, fears beneath the surface. Deep listening builds trust, creating empathy-based influence and profound human connection.

The Leader as Student

Great leaders never assume they know everything; they’re perpetual learners, absorbing wisdom from unexpected places. They ask powerful questions, sparking growth and adaptation in themselves and others. By continually learning, they nurture curiosity and humility.

The Leader as Servant

Authentic leadership isn’t standing above others but uplifting them. The servant leader prioritizes team, organization, and community needs above personal gain. Serving first, they build profound trust, loyalty, and commitment, earning influence no title alone can command.

The Leader as Flow

A river doesn’t resist its path; it adapts naturally. Adaptive leaders don’t fight reality; they align with it. Attuned to dynamics and opportunities, they guide gently but effectively. Flow-based leadership achieves results not through force but natural alignment, respecting the circumstances encountered.

The Leader as Mirror

Sometimes, leadership isn’t imposing direction but reflecting people’s inherent strengths and potential. Great leaders help others recognize their capabilities clearly. Empowering deeply, they inspire others to confidently step into their own capacities.

Examples of “Leading by Following”

Fred Rogers (Education/Media): “Mister Rogers” listened deeply to children’s concerns, fears, and emotions. Rather than dictating messages, he reflected children’s needs, guiding them gently toward growth and resilience.

Mother Teresa (Humanitarianism): Leadership rooted entirely in service, deeply listening to the vulnerable. Her presence wasn’t loud but profoundly impactful, embodying compassionate service, not authority.

Coach Gregg Popovich (Sports): Known for leading the NBA’s San Antonio Spurs, Popovich emphasizes listening and adapting to player insights, integrating their strengths rather than imposing rigid methods. His approach builds mutual respect and enduring team success.

Dr. Brené Brown (Research/Education): A celebrated vulnerability researcher who leads through curiosity and genuine engagement. Brown consistently learns from diverse sources, making others’ voices heard, building deeper collective insights.

Balancing Listening with Decisiveness

Critics argue: “Constant listening creates indecision, weakening leadership.” On the contrary, deep listening doesn’t preclude decisiveness. It provides vital context, enabling wiser, quicker decisions attuned to real needs. Leaders who listen intently act decisively, with genuine clarity, not reactive authority.

What Are You Truly Following?

Before asking, “Who am I leading?” true leaders first ask, “What am I following?” Ego or purpose? Crowd or truth? Assumptions or genuine wisdom?

By examining what you follow, you uncover deeper motivations. “Leading by Following” isn’t mere technique; it’s a shift toward humility, adaptability, and authentic connection.

Reflection Exercise: Deepening Your Connection

  • How much do you listen versus speak in interactions?
  • Recall leaders who deeply listened. What impact did they have?
  • Identify an upcoming meeting or interaction. Commit to deeper listening: talk less, absorb more.
  • Ask someone you lead: “How can I better support you?” Listen without defensiveness, then reflect on insights.

Part Four: Cultivate — Leading Sustainably

Leadership as Enduring Stewardship

Real leadership isn’t a sprint; it’s a marathon transcending momentary wins. Today’s environment mistakes genuine leadership for outcome engineering. We chase metrics and rapid results, fixated on quarterly reports. Yet organizations thrive not merely on outcomes but relationships, trust, and sustainable growth. Without these, success remains fleeting.

The “Cultivate” component of the 3C Model embodies a different mindset—leading with enduring stewardship. True impact isn’t measured immediately but in ripples persisting beyond the present. Cultivating leadership comprises three core practices: Building Trust, Thinking Long-Term, and Fostering Resilience.

1. Building Trust

Trust anchors lasting leadership, yet can’t be forced. It emerges from integrity, transparency, and empathy—traits demonstrated over time. Trust grows from leaders aligning words with actions, admitting mistakes, and treating others consistently and fairly. Though trust-building is subtle, its absence leaves organizations vulnerable, fractured under pressure.

Example: Dr. Anthony Fauci
Throughout the COVID-19 pandemic, Dr. Fauci’s consistent honesty, clear communication, and transparent acknowledgment of uncertainties cultivated public trust. His steadiness amid confusion exemplified trust-based leadership under immense pressure.

2. Thinking Long-Term

Modern leadership obsesses over immediacy. But true leaders think generationally, investing in enduring relationships, capabilities, and culture. They recognize stewardship as temporary guardianship of something greater than oneself. Long-term thinkers see beyond today’s crises, asking not merely “How do we win now?” but “What matters in ten years?”

Example: Wangari Maathai
Kenyan environmentalist Wangari Maathai founded the Green Belt Movement, planting millions of trees and empowering communities. Her focus wasn’t instant results but future generations’ sustainable growth. Maathai exemplified leadership transcending short-term gains, achieving profound enduring impact.

3. Fostering Resilience

Resilience tests true leadership. Change and disruption are inevitable, but resilient organizations evolve amid uncertainty. Resilient leaders create environments where adaptation is fluid, learning continuous, and support mutual. They view setbacks as growth opportunities, nurturing cultures where people feel empowered to adapt creatively. Such cultures don’t fear change; they embrace it with trust, shared purpose, and collective determination.

Example: Ernest Shackleton
Polar explorer Shackleton’s Endurance expedition exemplifies resilience. When stranded in Antarctic ice, his adaptive leadership, continuous encouragement, and unwavering resolve kept his crew alive. Shackleton fostered resilience that transformed catastrophe into survival, epitomizing true leadership under adversity.

Short-Term Pressure vs. Long-Term Leadership

Critics say, “Leaders face short-term pressures—boards, shareholders, urgent crises. Long-term thinking seems impractical.” Indeed, immediate pressures are real. Yet genuinely successful leaders integrate urgent decisions into broader visions. They meet short-term demands without compromising long-term sustainability, balancing today’s realities with tomorrow’s potential.

Ripple Effects of Cultivating Leadership

Leadership that cultivates trust, long-term thinking, and resilience creates ripple effects beyond immediate outcomes, transforming teams, organizations, communities, and lives profoundly. Cultivating leadership reshapes how we work, build relationships, and impact others—quietly, yet deeply.

Reflection Exercise: Cultivate Your Leadership

  • Trust: Reflect on leaders you trust deeply. Why? What can you emulate?
  • Long-term: Consider decisions made today. Which ones matter in five years? How can you align current actions with enduring goals?
  • Resilience: Recall past challenges. How did you respond? What did they teach you about resilience? How can you nurture collective resilience now?

Conclusion: Embracing The Leadership Paradox

Leadership is inherently paradoxical. We assume it means stepping forward, asserting control, dictating outcomes. Yet real leadership often requires the opposite: stepping back, letting go, and guiding by following. It’s not imposing our vision but revealing it—not forcing a path but discovering one already unfolding.

In a world obsessed with short-term gains, genuine leadership stands as quiet rebellion—a return to authenticity, human connection, and lasting stewardship. This leadership demands relinquishing ego and embracing humility, adaptability, and genuine presence. Its true paradox: the deeper we lead, the less we control; the greater our influence, the quieter our presence; the stronger our vision, the less we impose it.

To navigate this paradox, I’ve offered the 3C Model—a simple yet transformative mindset shift:

  • Core: Begin within. Know your values, strengths, limits. Lead with integrity, authenticity, humility.
  • Connect: Engage attentively. Listen deeply, empower genuinely, adapt fluidly. Influence through connection, not control.
  • Cultivate: Lead sustainably. Build trust, think long-term, nurture resilience. Create ripples extending beyond immediate results.

This approach isn’t a rigid formula but a fundamental rethink of leadership—not as performance, but presence; not control, but connection; not momentary gains, but lasting legacies.

My journey toward understanding this paradox wasn’t linear. It began from early chaos, leading myself from necessity. Encounters with remarkable leaders deepened this understanding—leaders whose influence defied convention. Through mistakes, successes, and profound reflection, my leadership philosophy took shape in ways no textbook could capture.

Yet for all complexities, leadership’s essence is simple and human: being real, present, connected—leading with empathy, humility, and stewardship. It’s letting go of power, allowing leadership to unfold naturally, authentically.

Idealistic vs. Practical

Critics argue this approach sounds idealistic, impractical in real-world pressures. Yes, pressures exist. But practicality doesn’t mean conformity. Countless leaders have proven authentic leadership’s effectiveness—achieving sustainable success by balancing short-term demands with long-term vision. True leadership isn’t idealistic; it’s courageously pragmatic, reshaping organizations from within existing constraints.

Leadership Paradox in Practice

Angela Merkel (Politics): Germany’s former Chancellor embodied paradoxical leadership—unassuming yet resolute, humble yet decisive. Merkel guided Europe through crises by listening attentively, building consensus, leading quietly yet profoundly.

José Mujica (Politics/Activism): Uruguay’s “humble president” lived simply, rejecting power’s trappings. Mujica’s paradoxical leadership inspired through humility, authenticity, and unwavering commitment to serving others above self.

Tenzin Gyatso, the 14th Dalai Lama (Spirituality): His Holiness exemplifies leadership without authority, influencing millions through compassion, humility, and gentle guidance rather than force.

Reflection: Your Leadership Journey

Reflect honestly on these questions:

  • Are you leading people or managing results?
  • Are you imposing vision or revealing it?
  • Are you controlling outcomes or cultivating connections?
  • Are you chasing short-term wins or nurturing lasting impact?

These aren’t simple questions. Yet grappling honestly opens pathways to transformative leadership, shifting your practice from performance to presence, from control to connection.

Action Step: Small Actions, Profound Shifts

This week, choose one trusted colleague. Ask: “How can I support you better?” Listen fully without defensiveness. Small acts create profound shifts. Begin today.

Embracing leadership’s paradox demands courage—to let go, step back, trust deeply. It requires faith in subtle forms of influence—ripples from authentic presence, genuine connection, enduring cultivation.

Embrace this paradox. Let go of control to gain true influence. Choose trust over force, presence over authority. Leadership isn’t about holding power—it’s about creating ripples that outlast you. May your leadership unfold not from force but authenticity—not from engineering outcomes but genuine stewardship.

True leadership isn’t forcing paths. It’s discovering paths already unfolding, walking them humbly, authentically, profoundly. This is The Leadership Paradox—beautiful in simplicity, powerful in subtlety, transformative in quiet authenticity.

⬅️ Back to The Arc
📥 Download PDF